Click to view text of Daf (can be minimized to view alongside player)
Diagram 1 Diagram 2 Diagram 3 Diagram 4 Diagram 5
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized to view alongside player)
Today’s Daf Yomi Question:
The Gemara explains why we don’t add another bracha to Havineinu on motzei Shabbos (for havdala) since Havineinu was established specifically as a ‘seven bracha unit’ and not eight. If Havineinu assumes a new identity as a ‘seven bracha tefilla’ then why doesn’t the Gemara require a source corresponding to this number as the Gemara sought regarding the various types of shemone esrei (i.e. 18 of weekdays, 7 of Shabbos etc.)?
How did Hillel know that the outcry wasn’t coming from his home – since we know that misfortunes will sometimes occur to good people for reasons known only to Hashem – if so what was the reason for Hillel’s certainty?
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized to view alongside player)
Download Audio (smaller file size)
Today’s Daf Yomi Question:
The Gemara relates that the Malach Hamaves couldn’t approach Dovid Hamelech who was learning Torah continuously. Why couldn’t he approach while he would tend to personal needs?
Dovid Hamelech was told by Hashem that he was destined to die on Shabbos. If so what was the purpose of learning uninterrupted; since it was already pre-determined?
Click here to reply / view answers
The Mishna says if one writes on his flesh he is chayav. Why is this case considered kesiva, since it will disappear due to the effect of the body’s moisture/heat?
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized to view alongside video)
Today’s Daf Yomi Question:
The Mishna says if one writes on his flesh he is chayav. Why is this case considered kesiva, since it will disappear due to the effect of the body’s moisture/heat?
One may not read ‘Ksav tachas hatzurah’ for it may lead to reading of business documents (Rashi). Is there something unique about this particular writing, or does this mean that any reading of words is assur on Shabbos?
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)
Today’s Daf Yomi Question:
One may not read ‘Ksav tachas hatzurah’ for it may lead to reading of business documents (Rashi). Is there something unique about this particular writing, or does this mean that any reading of words is assur on Shabbos?
Rebbi Yehuda seems to agree that the limit of a standard pietza is ten amos; which is presumably learned from Halacha lemoshe misinai. If so, how can he allow an opening of thirteen by Pasei Bira’os?
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)
Play Audio Only Download Audio Download Video Diagram 1
Today’s Daf Yomi Question:
Rebbi Yehuda seems to agree that the limit of a standard pietza is ten amos; which is presumably learned from Halacha lemoshe misinai. If so, how can he allow an opening of thirteen by Pasei Bira’os?
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)
Play Audio Only Download Audio Download Video Diagram 1 Diagram 2 Diagram 3 Diagram 4
Today’s Daf Yomi Question:
Rashi says that giving Tzedaka with personal benefit in mind does not constitute ‘Shelo lishma’. How can this be considered ‘Lishma’ if there is intent for personal benefit?
New LIVE interactive Shiur with Rabbi Kessler
In depth Daf Yomi – דף היומי בעיון
Daily 8:00 – 9:20 PM* (ET)
Zoom meeting ID – 6130000613 Password – 613
https://zoom.us/j/6130000613?pwd=dzJPNTZocTNZWWc0cHhtRTUrb04wZz09
Telephone dial-in:
929 205 6099 (N.Y.) 312 626 6799 (Chicago) 647 558 0588 (Canada)
*Fridays: 4:00 PM
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)
Play Audio Only Download Audio Download Video Chart 1 Chart 2 Chart 3
Next day’s Daf Yomi now appears below Today’s Daf Yomi
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)
Play Audio Only Download Audio Download Video
Insights on Today’s Daf
1) Is a volunteer fast day something positive or negative?
2) Mesillas Yesharim quoting the Yerushalmi.
Next day’s Daf Yomi – Taanis 12
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)
Play Audio Only Download Audio Download Video
The Gemara says that regarding monetary matters, one may harbor ill (even to a Torah scholar) until he actually returns the money to its rightful owner. Apparently teshuva (repentance) is not suffiecient. How is this consistent with the Gemara in Kiddushin (49b) which states that if one in mekadesh a woman on condition that he is a tzaddik, even if he was a known rasha (presumably having violated interpersonal monetary prohibitions as well) nevertheless the Kiddushin is valid on the chance that he quickly repented in his heart. In our Gemara it seems that simply contemplating thoughts of teshuva is not sufficient regarding monetary matters, unless he substantiates it with proper action.