Eruvin 33 – עירובין לג

Tosfos says in the case where the Eruv is in the tree below ten, the concept of ‘Ho’il’ (since it can be potentially transported in increments of less than four ammos) can be applied without any concern, as opposed to the case of the Eruv in the basket.  What is the difference?

Tosfos disagrees with Rashi’s allowance (according to Rebbi) to carry the Eruv incrementally through R”H.  If so, according to Tosfos why is the Eruv (in the tree below ten tefachim) valid?

Click here to reply

Eruvin 48 – עירובין מח

Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)

Play Audio Only    Download Audio    Download Video   Diagram 1    Diagram 2

Today’s Daf Yomi Question:

The Mishna (in Keilim which discusses shiurim based on personal size) does not list the din of four ammos, since it doesn’t apply universally.  Why does it list the din of two se’udos (for Eruv) which is also not absolute (see 30b)?

Eruvin 51 – עירובין נא

Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)

Play Audio Only    Download Audio    Download Video   Diagram 1    Diagram 2

Today’s Daf Yomi Question:

If Pas is preferred, then only an Ani can do an Eruv without bread.  But if Regel is preferred, then there are no restrictions regarding Pas – why?

Download Audio

Eruvin 61 – עירובין סא

Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)

Play Audio Only    Download Audio    Download Video   Diagram 1    Diagram 2

Today’s Daf Yomi Question:

When the Mishna describes the din of placing an Eruv inside a city, why do we need to mention two cases (large and small city)?

Download Audio

Eruvin 91 – עירובין צא


Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)

Play Audio Only    Download Audio    Download Video   Diagram 1

Today’s Daf Yomi Question:

How does Rav answer the Mishnah (of three chatzeros) where Rebbi Shimon seems not to be concerned with the possibilty of transferring the wrong kelim?

Download Audio