We see that Rebbi Yehuda deems the skin of those four sheratzim thick enough to be viewed as hide; although he actually adds a fifth one to the list. Why does this not indicate to us that (according to the Rabanan as well) these four are considered to have proper hides and not the others – also with regard to Shabbos?
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized to view alongside video)
Today’s Daf Yomi Question:
We see that Rebbi Yehuda deems the skin of those four sheratzim thick enough to be viewed as hide; although he actually adds a fifth one to the list. Why does this not indicate to us that (according to the Rabanan as well) these four are considered to have proper hides and not the others – also with regard to Shabbos?
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)
Play Audio Only Download Audio Download Video Diagram 1 Diagram 2 Diagram 3 Diagram 4
Today’s Daf Yomi Question:
If the pasuk would only mention ‘Shechar’ I would attribute it to the ‘Ke’ila’ fig. Why would a pasuk be needed to allow purchasing a fruit with Maaser?
If the pasuk would only mention ‘Shechar’ I would attribute it to the ‘Ke’ila’ fig. Why would a pasuk be needed to allow purchasing a fruit with Maaser?
