Rashi explains the concept of ‘Kol yisroel beni melchim’ to mean that we are not meant to differentiate between groups. Rashi earlier (67a) explained that all of Yisroel are actually regarded as princes. How do we resolve this apparent discrepancy in Rashi?
Rashi cites the tying of the ‘Yerios’ as the source for the melacha of Kosher, which seems a bit difficult in view of the fact that the Gemara (74b) seemed to have retracted from this as the source of Kosher.
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized to view alongside video)
Today’s Daf Yomi Question:
Rashi explains the concept of ‘Kol yisroel beni melchim’ to mean that we are not meant to differentiate between groups. Rashi earlier (67a) explained that all of Yisroel are actually regarded as princes. How do we resolve this apparent discrepancy in Rashi?
Rashi cites the tying of the ‘Yerios’ as the source for the melacha of Kosher, which seems a bit difficult in view of the fact that the Gemara (74b) seemed to have retracted from this as the source of Kosher.
Why was the muktza sandal allowed to be moved in a Karmelis?
Chizkiya expressed amazement at Rebbi Yochanan’s application of ‘Panim Chadashos’ to the case of the keli. Wasn’t he simply applying the concept that Chizkiya had himself taught?
Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized to view alongside video)
Today’s Daf Yomi Question:
Why was the muktza sandal allowed to be moved in a Karmelis?
Chizkiya expressed amazement at Rebbi Yochanan’s application of ‘Panim Chadashos’ to the case of the keli. Wasn’t he simply applying the concept that Chizkiya had himself taught?
