According to the Maskanah, how do we know that a hump less than three tefachim high is batel to Reshus Harabim?
The second Akira (according to Rebbi or Rebbi Yehuda) seems to have been done indirectly; why is he chayav for it min hatorah?
According to the Maskanah, how do we know that a hump less than three tefachim high is batel to Reshus Harabim?
The second Akira (according to Rebbi or Rebbi Yehuda) seems to have been done indirectly; why is he chayav for it min hatorah?
Lavud is universal. Even though there are two applications and types of Lavud, Mechitzos and others, they are both Hilchasa Gemiri La. That’s why it says here, כל פחות משלשה.
The second Akira is no less his doing than the Hanacha. They are both his Koach. It is not as if it bounced and rolled. Moreover, when you hold of Kluta or Beisa Kiman Dimalya Dami, the extended Akiros and Hanachos are a part of your original intent. We are saying that throwing an item through another domain is broken up into two Melachos.