The Gemara says a Melacha of significance which occurred in the Mishkan is considered an Av. Why then is Hachnassa (which occurred in the Mishkan) not included?
Quick Search:
Quick Search Daf Insights:
The Gemara says a Melacha of significance which occurred in the Mishkan is considered an Av. Why then is Hachnassa (which occurred in the Mishkan) not included?
Tosafos says that the second Terutz was needed for Hotza’a. Perhaps the “אי נמי” is not an alternative answer, only another answer that has its own application.