Eruvin 38 – עירובין לח

Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)

Play Audio Only    Download Audio    Download Video   Diagram 1    Diagram 2

Today’s Daf Yomi Question:

Why is going out to the Eruv site not considered Hachana, whereas verbalizing his intentions is Hachana?

One thought on “Eruvin 38 – עירובין לח

  1. The act in itself has nothing wrong with it. It is the intention that is the problem. Intentions that aren’t marked are merely intentions, and aren’t prohibited. On the oither hand, when the intention is outwardly clear that is more that an intention, it is action.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>