Eruvin 38 – עירובין לח

Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized alongside player)

Play Audio Only    Download Audio    Download Video   Diagram 1    Diagram 2

Today’s Daf Yomi Question:

Why is going out to the Eruv site not considered Hachana, whereas verbalizing his intentions is Hachana?

3 thoughts on “Eruvin 38 – עירובין לח

  1. The act in itself has nothing wrong with it. It is the intention that is the problem. Intentions that aren’t marked are merely intentions, and aren’t prohibited. On the oither hand, when the intention is outwardly clear that is more that an intention, it is action.

  2. The first question was asked and answered, but when he carries the food for the Eiruv why isn’t that considered Hachana (not just intention) for the next day It’s an action?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *