Shabbos 68 – שבת סח

The Gemara interprets the word ‘Gadol’ in reference to ‘Onesh’ (greater liability) since laws of Shabbos apply also to things detached etc.; why is this related to as a ‘liability’ and not simply another detail present in Hilchos Shabbos and absent by Shemittah?

How do we understand the obligation (according to Rav and Shmuel) of a Korban Chatas for a ‘Tinok Shenishbah’ who had no prior knowledge or awareness of this mitzvah; why is he not regarded as a Ones?

Shabbos 68 – שבת ס”ח

Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized to view alongside video)

Diagram 1   Diagram 2   Diagram 3   Diagram 4

Download Audio

Download Video (mp4)

Today’s Daf Yomi Question:

The Gemara interprets the word ‘Gadol’ in reference to ‘Onesh’ (greater liability) since laws of Shabbos apply also to things detached etc.; why is this related to as a ‘liability’ and not simply another detail present in Hilchos Shabbos and absent by Shemittah?

How do we understand the obligation (according to Rav and Shmuel) of a Korban Chatas for a ‘Tinok Shenishbah’ who had no prior knowledge or awareness of this mitzvah; why is he not regarded as a Ones?

 

Shabbos 70 – שבת ע

Click here to view text of Daf (can be minimized to view alongside video)

Diagram 1   Diagram 2   Diagram 3

Download Audio

Download Video (mp4)

Today’s Daf Yomi Question:

If one merely writes ‘Shem’ out of the word ‘Shimon’ he is chayav.  Why would this not be considered a Davar she’ino miskaven – since his intention was to write the complete word ‘Shimon’?

The Gemara was looking for a case where he forgot about the 39 melachos, but he is still regarded as knowledgeable about Shabbos.  Why can’t we say that the basic awareness that there is a concept of forbidden melachos on Shabbos is sufficient (although not specifically these 39) to deem him knowledgeable about Shabbos?

 

Shabbos 70 – שבת ע

If one merely writes ‘Shem’ out of the word ‘Shimon’ he is chayav. Why would this not be considered a Davar she’ino miskaven – since his intention was to write the complete word ‘Shimon’?

The Gemara was looking for a case where he forgot about the 39 melachos, but he is still regarded as knowledgeable about Shabbos. Why can’t we say that the basic awareness that there is a concept of forbidden melachos on Shabbos is sufficient (although not specifically these 39) to deem him knowledgeable about Shabbos?